I've been trying the "pulse and glide" technique to improve gas mileage (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_a...ced_techniques). In my commute I find that I can coast about 3.2 miles out of a 19 mile trip. When I do this I leave the engine running and place the automatic transmission in neutral. My speed varies between 64 and 75 mph during these glides.
My question is: does this actually save fuel? Here are the two possible answers:
Yes: When the car is coasting in neutral the engine is idling at about 800 rpm. That will use less gas than revving the engine at 2300 rpm in gear at the same speed. This opinion is supported by a tech at the Honda dealership. This tech said the engine uses more fuel at 2300 rpm than at 800 rpm regardless of the actual load on the engine.
No: I've read several articles recently (lost the citation) that indicated some modern engines will use zero fuel when car is coasting down hill and no load is on the engine.
Is there anyone who knows how the Honda 2007 GX engine works under these conditions? Remember, opinions are welcome, but I'm most interested in facts. Has anyone with a ScanGauge checked this out?
My question is: does this actually save fuel? Here are the two possible answers:
Yes: When the car is coasting in neutral the engine is idling at about 800 rpm. That will use less gas than revving the engine at 2300 rpm in gear at the same speed. This opinion is supported by a tech at the Honda dealership. This tech said the engine uses more fuel at 2300 rpm than at 800 rpm regardless of the actual load on the engine.
No: I've read several articles recently (lost the citation) that indicated some modern engines will use zero fuel when car is coasting down hill and no load is on the engine.
Is there anyone who knows how the Honda 2007 GX engine works under these conditions? Remember, opinions are welcome, but I'm most interested in facts. Has anyone with a ScanGauge checked this out?
Comment