If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'd go with the 2000 as well. My wife has a 2000 that we've owned since new. It now has over 104K miles and has only required routine maintenance. I wanted to upgrade her to the new body style, but I just can't justify the cost, especially in today's market with higher than MSRP offerings.
Thanks for the quick replies. The prices were the same, I spoke with the owner of the the 2000, and it sounds like that will be the one for me. I'm off to the bank today to see what I can work out.
The 2001 gets a little better mileage and range. It has a CVT transmission that is known to have problems and has a extended warranty because of that.
The 2000 has a standard 4 speed automatic transmission. I had a 99 and it was a good car.
If the price was the same between the two models I would take the 2000 with the much lower miles.
I'm looking at getting a gx and it looks like in my price range it's gonna be a 2000 or a 2001. Were there any great leaps between those two models? Right now there's a 2000 with about 20k miles on it or a 2001 with about 82k miles on it. What do you guys think?
Leave a comment: